smith and nephhew exogen bone healing system

However, at MFT and SRFT, rates of union with EXOGEN are below that previously published in the literature. No significant baseline differences were present in both outcome groups. Outcomes of the 23 patients with persistent non-union were as follows – 18 were referred for revision surgery, 5 were prescribed further EXOGEN therapy, 2 refused or were unfit for further intervention, and 1 did not have a plan documented. 47% of patients achieved radiological union following completion of EXOGEN therapy. Results: Fifty-eight patients were included in the primary review, with 9 subsequently excluded based on insufficient clinical data. In addition, local practices were observed and compared to EXOGEN’s standardized guidance for clinicians. Data were retrospectively collected from clinical documents detailing clinical presentation comorbidities, and radiographic images, determining the radiological union post EXOGEN therapy. An equal number of patients were included from both sites. Method: Patients receiving EXOGEN therapy between and at hospitals within MFT and SRFT were identified using EXOGEN logbooks and hospital IT systems.

* Corresponding author: To evaluate the efficacy of EXOGEN in achieving union and common pitfalls in its use within the Manchester Foundation Trust (MFT) and Salford Royal Foundation Trust (SRFT). Wythenshawe Hospital, Southmoor Rd, Wythenshawe, Manchester M23 9LT, UK Salford Royal Hospital, Stott Lane, Salford M6 8HD, UK Royal Liverpool Hospital, Prescot St., Liverpool L7 8XP, UK Stepping Hill Hospital, Poplar Grove, Hazel Grove, Stockport SK2 7JE, UK Hughes 1 *, Jamal Khudr 2, Edward Gee 3 and Anand Pillai 4

Smith and nephhew exogen bone healing system